Evidence
3 / 5 supporting
3 / 7 missing
A black-box simulator for testing whether controlled context interventions can become governed learning candidates without guessing hidden causes.
If the simulator cannot verify why a change should lead to a specific consequence, it does not approve the transition.
The simulator does not hide unknowns behind a score. Unknowns reduce certainty and block approval when material.
Higher pressure requires stronger evidence, clearer causality, and better recovery.
3 / 5 supporting
3 / 7 missing
Partial
Verified links must exceed the current pressure threshold.
Rollback path defined
Hysteresis is treated as a tracer, not a hidden-cause proof.
Unknowns material
Unresolved residuals remain visible and can block approval.
These are early live OpenAI API runs from a controlled simulator setup. They support a narrow claim: measurable governed system-level adaptation under explicit context intervention. They do not prove permanent model-weight learning.
3 / 3
Intervention trials reached positive_governed_drift.
3 / 3
Related RAG, memory, and wrapper-rule scenarios reached candidate path.
0
Negative controls reached candidate classification.
Early live tests suggest that a black-box LLM system can show measurable, context-conditioned governed adaptation after controlled interventions.
Not claimed: permanent model learning, hidden state access, attack attribution, or guaranteed causality.Define the behavioral movement and context.
Evaluate ripple and causal impact.
Apply evidence, recovery, and residual rules.
Approve, revise, reject, or leave unresolved.
The simulator does not claim that an AI has safely learned. It classifies whether the supplied evidence supports a governed learning candidate, and it keeps unresolved uncertainty visible.